Now Playing

Now on the Fly Tying Music Page Dave Rawlings Machine live from Bonnaroo 2010

Flag Counter

free counters

Did You Know About Balkan Trout?

Just when you think you know everything – you learn something new.

In an interview, on the podcast Speaking of Faith,  Author/Artist James Prosek mentioned his work with the Balkan Trout Restoration Group and the unique trout of the Balkans.

These Balkan trout are all similar in appearance to Brown Trout and are indeed closely related.  Some, like the Marble trout (Salmo marmoratus), are in danger of being hybridized out of existence by inter-breeding with Brown Trout

The most unique of these Balkan Trout has to be the Softmouth Trout.  Among these, the most morphologically distinct is the Neretva River Softmouth Trout (Salmo obtusirostris oxyrhynchus). As to which flies they prefer – well…


CTV Toronto – Big Great Lakes trout the most toxic, report says

Delicious? Think Again. Throw it back!

Delicious? Think Again. Throw it back!

According to this article, large trout taken from the Great Lakes are among the most toxic.  Just another reason to practice catch and release.

The Canadian Press

TORONTO — If the huge trout you caught from one of the Great Lakes ends up on your dinner table you might be at risk from alarmingly high levels of toxins, says a new report from advocacy group Environmental Defence.

read the article here: CTV Toronto – Big Great Lakes trout the most toxic

Hatchery Fish May Hurt Efforts To Sustain Wild Salmon Runs

Another bit of bad news from the world of science. It seems that those hatchery raised fish aren’t all that we thought they were. I know we all thought that they were robust and great for the gene pool – turns out that’s not the case (please read this sarcastically).

ScienceDaily (June 13, 2009) — Steelhead trout that are originally bred in hatcheries are so genetically impaired that, even if they survive and reproduce in the wild, their offspring will also be significantly less successful at reproducing, according to a new study published today by researchers from Oregon State University.

read the whole article at  Science Daily: Hatchery Fish May Hurt Efforts To Sustain Wild Salmon Runs.

Whirling disease researchers optimistic about Montana’s trout

Whirling disease researchers optimistic about Montana’s trout

May 20, 2009 — By Evelyn Boswell, MSU News Service

BOZEMAN — Whirling disease now infects about 150 streams across Montana, but researchers say they are still optimistic about the future of trout fishing in the state.

One of the most promising developments, they say, is the discovery of wild rainbow trout that are naturally resistant to whirling disease. Another is the mysterious rebound of rainbow trout in the Madison River, the first Montana river where whirling disease was discovered.

“There’s hope,” said Montana State University ecologist Billie Kerans. “There’s some hope for the trout in Montana. Not all drainages have responded the same way to whirling disease.”

Read the whole article at the Montana State University Website Whirling disease researchers optimistic about Montana’s trout.

Rock Snot (aka Didymo)

Didymo: picture from WV DNR website (click pic to go to the Didymo (Rock Snot) Fact Sheet)

Didymo: picture from WV DNR website (click pic to go to the Didymo (Rock Snot) Fact Sheet)

Sometimes it can be too easy to ignore things when they are not so close to home. Didymo is one of those things – I’ve never seen it in the streams that I fish…yet.

Well didymo is in the news again – it is showing up in more and more places. I came across several articles recently confirming it’s presence in yet more streams.

A fourth West Virginia Stream is Confirmed to have Didymo.

Invasive Algae Didymo Confirmed in Seneca Creek

The invasive algae known as Didymo has been found in Seneca Creek near its confluence with Whites Run, according to Mike Shingleton, Assistant Chief, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Section. An angler fishing in Seneca Creek had earlier sent DNR a picture of what he believed was Didymo. DNR personnel investigated the Didymo report and collected samples from Seneca Creek. Whites Run was also inspected in its lower reaches, but nothing resembling Didymo was observed. The Seneca Creek samples were sent to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources for confirmation. All samples contained Didymo.

In 2008, Didymo’s presence was confirmed from Elk River, Gandy Creek, and Glady Fork.
Read the whole story at the West Virgina DNR Website

Also Didymo was recently confirmed in the Esopus in New York State. Previously, didymo had been confirmed in the Batten Kill and in the East and West branches of the Delaware River.

DEC Confirms Presence Of Didymo In Esopus Creek
Aquatic Algae Discovered in Popular Recreational Waterway

Monday, April 27, 2009: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Pete Grannis today announced that didymo, an invasive species, has been confirmed in the Esopus Creek in Ulster County.

This is the first known presence of this aquatic algae, also called “rock snot,” in the Esopus and the third confirmed location in New York State…

DEC collected samples and confirmed the presence of didymo in the vicinity of several public access sites along a 12-mile stretch of the Esopus from the “Shandaken Portal” (which transfers water to the Esopus from Schoharie Reservoir) to New York City’s Ashokan Reservoir.
Read the whole story at the NY DEC Website

I guess the message is to assume that Didymo can be anywhere and to take the necessary precautions. What can the conscientious angler do?

The basic precautions consist of washing , disinfecting and drying all equipment.  Including waders and wading shoes.  Consider replacing any felt soled waders with the new “sticky” rubber soled (and cleated if you’d like) wading shoes or waders.  I have a pair of Aquastealth rubber soled (with cleats) wading boots from L.L.Bean and they work perfectly – no slipping.

Rather than re-listing all the precautions needed to reduce the spread of Didymo in this post I’ll direct you to a  good resource that has all the info you’ll need.

Also for some more complete info on Didymo check out the USDA link below – there are links from this site to many other places to get info.

PA FISH & BOAT COMMISSION RELEASES TROUT COST STUDY

Ever wonder what it costs to produce a stocked trout in Pennsylvania? The PA Fish & Boat Commission (PFBC) released the results of a comprehensive cost analysis.

Results from a Fish & Boat Commission (PFBC) stocked trout cost study (appendices) show that the agency spends approximately $2.17 to produce an average adult trout, an amount less than that charged by commercial trout hatcheries. Overall, the Commission spends approximately $12.4 million per year to provide more than 6 million of the popular game fish, including fingerlings and adults.

From the PFBC Website

The question that I have is: What is the cost to the wild trout that are stocked over? Wouldn’t it be great to see a policy where wild trout streams are no longer stocked? I understand that this is a politically charged idea but why not dream a little dream?

Pennsylvania’s largest brown trout of 2008

The  Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission posted the largest recorded fish caught in Pennsylvania 2008.  The interesting thing to me is the brown trout list – 4 out of 5 on the list were caught in Lake Erie Tribs.  The largest, a 13-lb, 30-inch Brown was caught Jan. 19, 2008 on Walnut Creek.

See the full list at the PA Fish Commission Site, PA’s Biggest Fish of 2008.

Is this a new trend?  Well, I looked at the list of biggest fish back through 2001 – and based on this not so exhaustive literature search – it is a new thing.  There are no other years in that time span with such a preponderance of the largest recorded browns coming from Lake Erie Tribs.  However in 2005  four of five of the largest browns came from Lake Erie itself.

The brown trout showing up in Erie and its tributaries in Pennsylvania is incidental – a result of stocking of adult trout in some of the tributary streams, and stocking by other states.  It is not a result of an effort to develop this fishery.  But that is changing.

The PA Fish Commission is on-board with developing a brown trout fishery in the Erie Tribs.  No later than 2009, the PA Fish Commission — plans to begin stocking 50,000-100,000 brown trout each year in Lake Erie itself or its tributary streams.

Read a good article about this in the Pittsburgh Tribune Review.